<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Pfeifer Perez</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pfeiferperez.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pfeiferperez.com</link>
	<description>Discount binoculars and binocular accessories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:29:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Can you look at these binoculars? by brad_hoehne</title>
		<link>http://www.pfeiferperez.com/general/can-you-look-at-these-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-9519</link>
		<dc:creator>brad_hoehne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pfeiferperez.com/general/can-you-look-at-these-binoculars/#comment-9519</guid>
		<description>Given that this is posted in the &quot;Astronomy and Space&quot; section, I&#039;m assuming that you&#039;ll be using these for stargazing.   

 With that in mind, the SPECS look pretty good for a pair of Binoculars in that price range.  The fact that they contain the superlative BAK-4 prisms suggests that they are optically good.  

The one thing I would suggest looking into is the eye-relief (which is not stated).  For wearers of glasses, this is an important factor.  Short eye relief makes it difficult to see the entire field of view.

Another caveat:   This particular brand is not amongst those highly regarded by today&#039;s observers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that this is posted in the &#8220;Astronomy and Space&#8221; section, I&#8217;m assuming that you&#8217;ll be using these for stargazing.   </p>
<p> With that in mind, the SPECS look pretty good for a pair of Binoculars in that price range.  The fact that they contain the superlative BAK-4 prisms suggests that they are optically good.  </p>
<p>The one thing I would suggest looking into is the eye-relief (which is not stated).  For wearers of glasses, this is an important factor.  Short eye relief makes it difficult to see the entire field of view.</p>
<p>Another caveat:   This particular brand is not amongst those highly regarded by today&#8217;s observers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can you look at these binoculars? by Geoff G</title>
		<link>http://www.pfeiferperez.com/general/can-you-look-at-these-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-9518</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pfeiferperez.com/general/can-you-look-at-these-binoculars/#comment-9518</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;d choose the Pentax instead, since they are a known quality:
http://www.binoculars-uk.co.uk/acatalog/Pentax_XCF_Binoculars.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;d choose the Pentax instead, since they are a known quality:<br />
<a href="http://www.binoculars-uk.co.uk/acatalog/Pentax_XCF_Binoculars.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.binoculars-uk.co.uk/acatalog/Pentax_XCF_Binoculars.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can you look at these binoculars? by Andrew S</title>
		<link>http://www.pfeiferperez.com/general/can-you-look-at-these-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-9517</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pfeiferperez.com/general/can-you-look-at-these-binoculars/#comment-9517</guid>
		<description>Barr &amp; Stroud are an old famous name in binoculars but they disappeared for quite a while because of company takeovers.  The new Barr &amp; Stroud basically have nothing in common with the old one.

These binoculars where formerly Bresser branded.  They are not truly terrible but there are better options in the price bracket.  My preference in this kind of territory would be the Visionary B4s.  They are fairly basic but solidly built and essentially reasonable performers, and should be a bit cheaper that those binos you are looking at.

The Optical Hardware Elinors have had mainly positive reviews and are very solidly built (they&#039;re confident enough to offer a 30 year warranty) but you would be looking at the  8x45s - a tad smaller but still a pretty good spec in my view. However when I handled them I found there&#039;s something not quite right about the balance - they just don&#039;t _feel_ right in my hands.  That is purely subjective of course but I&#039;d recommend to make sure you try before you buy.

If you really must have roof prism binos then I&#039;d look at Hawke Blackwatches.  Like most cheapish roof prism binos they do put diffraction spikes on stars, but those are not too bad - certainly better than many in the price bracket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barr &#038; Stroud are an old famous name in binoculars but they disappeared for quite a while because of company takeovers.  The new Barr &#038; Stroud basically have nothing in common with the old one.</p>
<p>These binoculars where formerly Bresser branded.  They are not truly terrible but there are better options in the price bracket.  My preference in this kind of territory would be the Visionary B4s.  They are fairly basic but solidly built and essentially reasonable performers, and should be a bit cheaper that those binos you are looking at.</p>
<p>The Optical Hardware Elinors have had mainly positive reviews and are very solidly built (they&#8217;re confident enough to offer a 30 year warranty) but you would be looking at the  8&#215;45s &#8211; a tad smaller but still a pretty good spec in my view. However when I handled them I found there&#8217;s something not quite right about the balance &#8211; they just don&#8217;t _feel_ right in my hands.  That is purely subjective of course but I&#8217;d recommend to make sure you try before you buy.</p>
<p>If you really must have roof prism binos then I&#8217;d look at Hawke Blackwatches.  Like most cheapish roof prism binos they do put diffraction spikes on stars, but those are not too bad &#8211; certainly better than many in the price bracket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are most/all the constellations we see with binoculars within our galaxy? by Keith P</title>
		<link>http://www.pfeiferperez.com/general/are-mostall-the-constellations-we-see-with-binoculars-within-our-galaxy/comment-page-1/#comment-9516</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pfeiferperez.com/general/are-mostall-the-constellations-we-see-with-binoculars-within-our-galaxy/#comment-9516</guid>
		<description>Not only within our own galaxy, but nearly all are close neighbors to us by galactic standards. Most stars visible with binoculars are within 3000 light-years, while the entire Milky Way is about 100,000 light-years in diameter.

The only exceptions are a few distant galaxies visible with binocs, such as M31, M33, the Magellanic Clouds. The Messier List contains over two dozen galaxies that are visible with good binoculars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only within our own galaxy, but nearly all are close neighbors to us by galactic standards. Most stars visible with binoculars are within 3000 light-years, while the entire Milky Way is about 100,000 light-years in diameter.</p>
<p>The only exceptions are a few distant galaxies visible with binocs, such as M31, M33, the Magellanic Clouds. The Messier List contains over two dozen galaxies that are visible with good binoculars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are most/all the constellations we see with binoculars within our galaxy? by rogerloh90</title>
		<link>http://www.pfeiferperez.com/general/are-mostall-the-constellations-we-see-with-binoculars-within-our-galaxy/comment-page-1/#comment-9515</link>
		<dc:creator>rogerloh90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pfeiferperez.com/general/are-mostall-the-constellations-we-see-with-binoculars-within-our-galaxy/#comment-9515</guid>
		<description>Yes, you are right. Binoculars only can magnify about 10 times the object. Hence, we can only see the part of solar system by binoculars and yes, solar system lies on the Milky Way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you are right. Binoculars only can magnify about 10 times the object. Hence, we can only see the part of solar system by binoculars and yes, solar system lies on the Milky Way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

